Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-8600K outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-8600K is 56 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-8600K
- Performs up to 2% better in Battlefield 1 than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 244 vs 239 FPS
- Up to 92% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - CA$114.21 vs CA$1393.07
- Up to 92% better value when playing Battlefield 1 than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - CA$0.47 vs CA$5.83 per FPS
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 95 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-8600K - 32 vs 6 threads
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
FPS
244
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.47/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$114.21
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$114.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 55723 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
239
97.95081967213115%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$5.83/FPS
8.061749571183533%
Price, CA$
CA$1393.07
8%
Buy for CA$1,393.07 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 55723 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Single-Core
1171
75.74385510996119%
Multi-Core
7539
100%
Intel Core i5-8600K | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X |
---|---|---|
Oct 5th, 2017 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 16 |
6 | Threads | 32 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |