Key Differences
In short — Core i5-7600K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-7600K is 490 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7600K
- Performs up to 26% better in Rust than Celeron G3900 - 200 vs 159 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 91% cheaper than Core i5-7600K - CA$21.99 vs CA$235.0
- Up to 88% better value when playing Rust than Core i5-7600K - CA$0.14 vs CA$1.18 per FPS
- Consumes up to 44% less energy than Intel Core i5-7600K - 51 vs 91 Watts
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
200
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.18/FPS
11%
Price, CA$
CA$235
9%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$235 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 158 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
159
79%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.14/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$21.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$21.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 157 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-7600K | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
91 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |