Key Differences
In short — Core i9-7920X outperforms the cheaper Core i5-760 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-760 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-7920X is 2611 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-760.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-760
- Up to 93% cheaper than Core i9-7920X - CA$41.21 vs CA$600.75
- Up to 93% better value when playing Valheim than Core i9-7920X - CA$0.22 vs CA$3.0 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i9-7920X - 95 vs 140 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7920X
- Performs up to 5% better in Valheim than Core i5-760 - 200 vs 190 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-760 - 24 vs 4 threads
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jul 18th, 2010
FPS
190
95%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.22/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$41.21
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$41.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 153 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
FPS
200
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3/FPS
7%
Price, CA$
CA$600.75
6%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$600.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 154 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jul 18th, 2010
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-760 | vs | Intel Core i9-7920X |
---|---|---|
Jul 18th, 2010 | Release Date | Sep 10th, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Lynnfield | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 140 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |