Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-760 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-760 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 4553 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-760.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-760
- Up to 92% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - CA$41.21 vs CA$529.18
- Up to 90% better value when playing Saints Row than Core i9-13900F - CA$0.28 vs CA$2.89 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 25% better in Saints Row than Core i5-760 - 183 vs 146 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-760 - 32 vs 4 threads
Saints Row
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 18th, 2010
FPS
146
79%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.28/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$41.21
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$41.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 28 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
183
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.89/FPS
9%
Price, CA$
CA$529.18
7%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$529.18 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 28 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 18th, 2010
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-760 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900F |
---|---|---|
Jul 18th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Lynnfield | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
95 W | TDP | Not Available |
45 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |