Buy on Amazon
CA$41.21
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-760 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-760 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900 is 3574 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-760.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-760
- Up to 90% cheaper than Core i9-10900 - CA$41.21 vs CA$396.99
- Up to 88% better value when playing Far Cry 5 than Core i9-10900 - CA$0.22 vs CA$1.83 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900
- Performs up to 18% better in Far Cry 5 than Core i5-760 - 217 vs 184 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i5-760 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-760 - 20 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-760 doesn't have integrated graphics
Far Cry 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-760
Desktop • Jul 18th, 2010
FPS
184
84%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.22/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$41.21
100%
Value Winner
Intel Core I5-760 I5 760 2.8 GHz Used Quad-Core Quad-Thread CPU Processor 8M 95W LGA 1156
Buy for CA$41.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 30 minutes ago
Core i9-10900
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
217
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.83/FPS
12%
Price, CA$
CA$396.99
10%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i9-10900 Desktop Processor 10 Cores up to 5.2 GHz LGA 1200 (Intel 400 Series Chipset) 65W
Buy for CA$396.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 30 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-760
Desktop • Jul 18th, 2010
Core i9-10900
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-760 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900 |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 18th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Lynnfield | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 10 |
| 4 | Threads | 20 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 21.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
