Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10300 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-760 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-760 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10300 is 3574 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-760.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-760
- Up to 72% cheaper than Core i3-10300 - CA$41.21 vs CA$144.99
- Up to 69% better value when playing Deathloop than Core i3-10300 - CA$0.25 vs CA$0.81 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10300
- Performs up to 7% better in Deathloop than Core i5-760 - 180 vs 168 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i5-760 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-760 - 8 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-760 doesn't have integrated graphics
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 18th, 2010
FPS
168
93%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.25/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$41.21
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$41.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 216 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
180
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.81/FPS
30%
Price, CA$
CA$144.99
28%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$144.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 216 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 18th, 2010
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-760 | vs | Intel Core i3-10300 |
---|---|---|
Jul 18th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Lynnfield | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |