Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-760 outperforms the more expensive FX-8150 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-760 is 451 days older than the more expensive FX-8150.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-760
- Up to 53% cheaper than FX-8150 - CA$41.21 vs CA$87.12
- Up to 53% better value when playing Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than FX-8150 - CA$0.23 vs CA$0.49 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-8150 - 95 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-760 - 8 vs 4 threads
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jul 18th, 2010
FPS
178
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.23/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$41.21
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$41.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 124 minutes ago
Buy for CA$87.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 124 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jul 18th, 2010
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-760 | vs | AMD FX-8150 |
---|---|---|
Jul 18th, 2010 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Lynnfield | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |