Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-10105F outperforms the more expensive Core i5-7400T on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-10105F is 1533 days newer than the more expensive Core i5-7400T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7400T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i3-10105F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-10105F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Performs up to 5% better in Saints Row than Core i5-7400T - 162 vs 155 FPS
- Up to 62% cheaper than Core i5-7400T - CA$96.0 vs CA$250.0
- Up to 63% better value when playing Saints Row than Core i5-7400T - CA$0.59 vs CA$1.61 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7400T - 8 vs 4 threads
Saints Row
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for CA$250 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16630 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
162
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.59/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$96
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$96 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16629 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-7400T | vs | Intel Core i3-10105F |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |