Key Differences
In short — Core i5-7400 outperforms the cheaper FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-7400 is 1910 days newer than the cheaper FX-8150.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7400
- Performs up to 1% better in Crysis 3 Remastered than FX-8150 - 180 vs 178 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8150 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8150 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Up to 56% cheaper than Core i5-7400 - CA$87.12 vs CA$196.99
- Up to 55% better value when playing Crysis 3 Remastered than Core i5-7400 - CA$0.49 vs CA$1.09 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7400 - 8 vs 4 threads
Crysis 3 Remastered
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
180
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.09/FPS
44%
Price, CA$
CA$196.99
44%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$196.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 183 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
178
98%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.49/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$87.12
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$87.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 182 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-7400 | vs | AMD FX-8150 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |