Key Differences
In short — Core i5-6600T outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 7 2700 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 7 2700 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-6600T is 1022 days older than the cheaper Ryzen 7 2700.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6600T
- Performs up to 1% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than Ryzen 7 2700 - 121 vs 120 FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 2700 - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 2700 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 2700
- Up to 35% cheaper than Core i5-6600T - CA$158.07 vs CA$244.5
- Up to 35% better value when playing ARK: Survival Evolved than Core i5-6600T - CA$1.32 vs CA$2.02 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-6600T - 16 vs 4 threads
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
FPS
121
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.02/FPS
65.34653465346535%
Price, CA$
CA$244.5
64%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$244.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58295 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
120
99.17355371900827%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.32/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$158.07
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$158.07 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58296 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-6600T | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 2700 |
---|---|---|
Jul 2nd, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Skylake | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
UHD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |