Buy on Amazon
CA$244.5
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $213
Availability
MSRP in USD: $213
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-6600T outperforms the more expensive FX-9590 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-6600T is 751 days newer than the more expensive FX-9590.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6600T
- Performs up to 10% better in Lost Ark than FX-9590 - 249 vs 226 FPS
- Up to 55% cheaper than FX-9590 - CA$244.5 vs CA$549.41
- Up to 60% better value when playing Lost Ark than FX-9590 - CA$0.98 vs CA$2.43 per FPS
- Consumes up to 84% less energy than AMD FX-9590 - 35 vs 220 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-9590 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-9590
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-6600T - 8 vs 4 threads
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Core i5-6600T
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
FPS
249
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.98/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$244.5
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i5 i5-6600T Quad-core (4 Core) 2.70 GHz Processor - Socket H4 LGA-1151 Pack CM8066201920601
Buy for CA$244.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1934 minutes ago
FX-9590
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
FPS
226
90.76305220883533%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.43/FPS
40.32921810699588%
Price, CA$
CA$549.41
44%
AMD FD9590FHHKWOF Fx-9590 OEM-Series 8-Core Processor Black Edition
Buy for CA$549.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1933 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Core i5-6600T
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
FX-9590
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-6600T | vs | AMD FX-9590 |
|---|---|---|
Jul 2nd, 2015 | Release Date | Jun 11th, 2013 |
| Core i5 | Collection | FX |
| Skylake | Codename | Vishera |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
| 3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 220 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 23.5x |
UHD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
