Buy on Amazon
CA$340
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $109
Availability
MSRP in USD: $109
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 1200 outperforms the cheaper FX-9590 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-9590 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 3 1200 is 1507 days newer than the cheaper FX-9590.
Advantages of AMD FX-9590
- Up to 48% cheaper than Ryzen 3 1200 - CA$340.0 vs CA$649.99
- Up to 41% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Ryzen 3 1200 - CA$0.75 vs CA$1.28 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 1200 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 1200
- Performs up to 12% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than FX-9590 - 507 vs 454 FPS
- Consumes up to 70% less energy than AMD FX-9590 - 65 vs 220 Watts
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FX-9590
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
FPS
454
89%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.75/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$340
100%
Value Winner
AMD FD9590FHHKWOF Fx-9590 OEM-Series 8-Core Processor Black Edition
Buy for CA$340 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 138 minutes ago
Ryzen 3 1200
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2017
FPS
507
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.28/FPS
58%
Price, CA$
CA$649.99
52%
FPS Winner
Acer Chromebook Plus 514 Laptop – 14" WUXGA 1920 x 1200 IPS Touch Display | AMD Ryzen 3 7320C | 8GB LPDDR5X | 128GB eMMC | Wi-Fi 6E | FHD Facial Auto Exposure Camera | Chrome OS | CB514-3HT-R8RB
Buy for CA$649.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 139 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FX-9590
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Ryzen 3 1200
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-9590 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 1200 |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 11th, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 27th, 2017 |
| FX | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
| Vishera | Codename | Summit Ridge |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
4.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| 220 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 23.5x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
