Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900K outperforms the cheaper FX-9590 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-9590 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900K is 2515 days newer than the cheaper FX-9590.
Advantages of AMD FX-9590
- Up to 51% cheaper than Core i9-10900K - CA$340.0 vs CA$699.99
- Up to 42% better value when playing Need For Speed Unbound than Core i9-10900K - CA$2.74 vs CA$4.7 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900K
- Performs up to 20% better in Need For Speed Unbound than FX-9590 - 149 vs 124 FPS
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than AMD FX-9590 - 125 vs 220 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-9590 - 20 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-9590 doesn't have integrated graphics
Need For Speed Unbound
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
FPS
124
83%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.74/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$340
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$340 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 50 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
149
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$4.7/FPS
58%
Price, CA$
CA$699.99
48%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$699.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 50 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-9590 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900K |
---|---|---|
Jun 11th, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
FX | Collection | Core i9 |
Vishera | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
4.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
220 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
23.5x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |