Key Differences
In short — Core i9-7920X outperforms the cheaper FX-9590 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-9590 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-7920X is 1552 days newer than the cheaper FX-9590.
Advantages of AMD FX-9590
- Up to 43% cheaper than Core i9-7920X - CA$340.0 vs CA$600.75
- Up to 38% better value when playing FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than Core i9-7920X - CA$1.5 vs CA$2.43 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7920X
- Performs up to 9% better in FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than FX-9590 - 247 vs 226 FPS
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than AMD FX-9590 - 140 vs 220 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-9590 - 24 vs 8 threads
FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
FPS
226
91%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.5/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$340
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$340 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 266 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
FPS
247
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.43/FPS
61%
Price, CA$
CA$600.75
56%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$600.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 266 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-9590 | vs | Intel Core i9-7920X |
---|---|---|
Jun 11th, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 10th, 2017 |
FX | Collection | Core i9 |
Vishera | Codename | Skylake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
4.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
220 W | TDP | 140 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
23.5x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |