Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-6600T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-6600T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-13700F is 2743 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-6600T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6600T
- Up to 48% cheaper than Core i7-13700F - CA$244.5 vs CA$468.99
- Up to 41% better value when playing Valheim than Core i7-13700F - CA$1.23 vs CA$2.08 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-13700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700F
- Performs up to 14% better in Valheim than Core i5-6600T - 225 vs 198 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-6600T - 24 vs 4 threads
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
FPS
198
88%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.23/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$244.5
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$244.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1723 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
225
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.08/FPS
59.13461538461539%
Price, CA$
CA$468.99
52%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$468.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1730 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Single-Core
1181
44.38181134911687%
Multi-Core
3223
20.82714054927302%
Intel Core i5-6600T | vs | Intel Core i7-13700F |
---|---|---|
Jul 2nd, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Skylake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
UHD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |