Buy on Amazon
CA$122.15
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $182
Availability
MSRP in USD: $182
Availability
Availability
No items available
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-6400 outperforms Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-6400 is 551 days older than Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6400
- Performs up to 6% better in FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than Celeron G3930 - 240 vs 227 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i5-6400 - 51 vs 65 Watts
FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Intel Boxed Core I5-6400 FC-LGA14C 2.70 Ghz 6 M Processor Cache 4 LGA 1151 BX80662I56400
Buy for CA$122.15 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74416 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Core i5-6400
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Celeron G3930
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G3930
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
608
54.725472547254725%
Multi-Core
1043
34.502150181938475%
Intel Core i5-6400 | vs | Intel Celeron G3930 |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 2nd, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
| Skylake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| 3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 65 W | TDP | 51 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 27.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
| HD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
