Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1920X outperforms the cheaper Core i5-6400 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is 770 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-6400.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6400
- Up to 56% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - CA$122.15 vs CA$280.74
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Performs up to 1% better in Crysis 3 Remastered than Core i5-6400 - 180 vs 179 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-6400 - 24 vs 4 threads
Crysis 3 Remastered
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for CA$122.15 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74903 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
180
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
Price, CA$
CA$280.74
43%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$280.74 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74903 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Single-Core
1111
94.63373083475298%
Multi-Core
3023
43.334288990825684%
Intel Core i5-6400 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
---|---|---|
Jul 2nd, 2015 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Skylake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
HD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |