Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1950X outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4670K on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is 1530 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4670K.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4670K
- Up to 76% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - CA$216.81 vs CA$885.66
- Consumes up to 53% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 84 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Performs up to 1% better in Borderlands 3 than Core i5-4670K - 216 vs 214 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4670K - 32 vs 4 threads
Borderlands 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
Buy for CA$216.81 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 143 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
216
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
Price, CA$
CA$885.66
24%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$885.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 144 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Single-Core
1171
93.30677290836653%
Multi-Core
7539
100%
Intel Core i5-4670K | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Haswell | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
84 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |