Key Differences
In short — Core i9-7920X outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4670 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-4670 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-7920X is 1561 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4670.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4670
- Up to 47% cheaper than Core i9-7920X - CA$319.99 vs CA$600.75
- Up to 45% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i9-7920X - CA$2.52 vs CA$4.62 per FPS
- Consumes up to 40% less energy than Intel Core i9-7920X - 84 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-7920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7920X
- Performs up to 2% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-4670 - 130 vs 127 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4670 - 24 vs 4 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
FPS
127
97%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.52/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$319.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$319.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1057 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
FPS
130
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$4.62/FPS
54%
Price, CA$
CA$600.75
53%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$600.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1061 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-4670 | vs | Intel Core i9-7920X |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 10th, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
84 W | TDP | 140 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |