Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10320 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4670 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-4670 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10320 is 2524 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4670.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4670
- Up to 50% cheaper than Core i3-10320 - CA$128.63 vs CA$259.45
- Up to 48% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Core i3-10320 - CA$0.76 vs CA$1.46 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 5% better in No Man's Sky than Core i5-4670 - 178 vs 170 FPS
- Consumes up to 23% less energy than Intel Core i5-4670 - 65 vs 84 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4670 - 8 vs 4 threads
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
FPS
170
95%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.76/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$128.63
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$128.63 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 138 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
178
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.46/FPS
52%
Price, CA$
CA$259.45
49%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$259.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 137 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-4670 | vs | Intel Core i3-10320 |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
84 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |