Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9400F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4670 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-4670 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-9400F is 2046 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4670.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4670
- Up to 15% cheaper than Core i5-9400F - CA$129.58 vs CA$153.19
- Up to 14% better value when playing World of Tanks than Core i5-9400F - CA$0.25 vs CA$0.29 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-9400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Performs up to 1% better in World of Tanks than Core i5-4670 - 532 vs 526 FPS
- Consumes up to 23% less energy than Intel Core i5-4670 - 65 vs 84 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4670 - 6 vs 4 threads
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
FPS
526
98%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.25/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$129.58
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$129.58 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
532
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.29/FPS
86%
Price, CA$
CA$153.19
84%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$153.19 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-4670 | vs | Intel Core i5-9400F |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 6 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
84 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |