Key Differences
In short — Core i5-4670 outperforms the cheaper FX-8300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-4670 is 222 days newer than the cheaper FX-8300.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4670
- Performs up to 1% better in Control than FX-8300 - 201 vs 199 FPS
- Consumes up to 12% less energy than AMD FX-8300 - 84 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8300
- Up to 36% cheaper than Core i5-4670 - CA$83.46 vs CA$129.58
- Up to 34% better value when playing Control than Core i5-4670 - CA$0.42 vs CA$0.64 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4670 - 8 vs 4 threads
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
FPS
201
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.64/FPS
65%
Price, CA$
CA$129.58
64%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$129.58 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
199
99%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.42/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$83.46
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$83.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-4670 | vs | AMD FX-8300 |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Haswell | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
84 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |