Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700F outperforms Core i5-4300M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-10700F is 2433 days newer than Core i5-4300M.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4300M
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700F - 37 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 25% better in War Thunder than Core i5-4300M - 192 vs 154 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4300M - 16 vs 4 threads
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
192
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.31/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$444.48
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$444.48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14713 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Mobile • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-4300M | vs | Intel Core i7-10700F |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket G3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
37 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD 5000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |