Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1950X outperforms Core i5-3450S on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is 1929 days newer than Core i5-3450S.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3450S
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Performs up to 123% better in League of Legends than Core i5-3450S - 154 vs 69 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3450S - 32 vs 4 threads
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
154
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$5.78/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$890.53
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$890.53 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3816 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Single-Core
584
49.87190435525192%
Multi-Core
1681
22.29738692134235%
Intel Core i5-3450S | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |