Key Differences
In short — Core i7-3960X outperforms the cheaper Core i5-3450 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-3450 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-3960X is 167 days older than the cheaper Core i5-3450.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3450
- Up to 66% cheaper than Core i7-3960X - CA$208.96 vs CA$617.31
- Up to 66% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i7-3960X - CA$1.79 vs CA$5.19 per FPS
- Consumes up to 41% less energy than Intel Core i7-3960X - 77 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-3960X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3960X
- Performs up to 2% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-3450 - 119 vs 117 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3450 - 12 vs 4 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
117
98%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.79/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$208.96
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$208.96 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 219 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 14th, 2011
FPS
119
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$5.19/FPS
34%
Price, CA$
CA$617.31
33%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$617.31 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 219 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Nov 14th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3450 | vs | Intel Core i7-3960X |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Nov 14th, 2011 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Sandy Bridge E |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
77 W | TDP | 130 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |