Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-3450 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-3450 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900KF is 3803 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-3450.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3450
- Up to 79% cheaper than Core i9-13900KF - CA$126.73 vs CA$608.98
- Up to 71% better value when playing Battlefield V than Core i9-13900KF - CA$0.6 vs CA$2.07 per FPS
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KF - 77 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KF
- Performs up to 39% better in Battlefield V than Core i5-3450 - 294 vs 212 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3450 - 32 vs 4 threads
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
212
72%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.6/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$126.73
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$126.73 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 62 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
294
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.07/FPS
28%
Price, CA$
CA$608.98
20%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$608.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 71 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3450 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900KF |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
77 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |