Key Differences
In short — Core i5-3450 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1840 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1840 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-3450 is 732 days older than the cheaper Celeron G1840.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3450
- Performs up to 2% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Celeron G1840 - 93 vs 91 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1840 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1840
- Up to 80% cheaper than Core i5-3450 - CA$41.21 vs CA$208.96
- Up to 80% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i5-3450 - CA$0.45 vs CA$2.25 per FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Core i5-3450 - 53 vs 77 Watts
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
93
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.25/FPS
20%
Price, CA$
CA$208.96
19%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$208.96 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 178 minutes ago
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
91
97%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.45/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$41.21
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$41.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 178 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3450 | vs | Intel Celeron G1840 |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
77 W | TDP | 53 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
No | Overclockable | No |