Key Differences
In short — FX-6300 outperforms Core i5-3437U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-6300 is 70 days older than Core i5-3437U.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3437U
- Consumes up to 82% less energy than AMD FX-6300 - 17 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Performs up to 1% better in Horizon Zero Dawn than Core i5-3437U - 152 vs 151 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3437U - 6 vs 4 threads
Horizon Zero Dawn
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultimate
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
152
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.39/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$59.57
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$59.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 117 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultimate
Mobile • Jan 1st, 2013
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3437U | vs | AMD FX-6300 |
---|---|---|
Jan 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Vishera |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 6 |
1.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
2.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |