Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700F outperforms Core i5-3210M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-10700F is 2890 days newer than Core i5-3210M.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3210M
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 7% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than Core i5-3210M - 124 vs 116 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3210M - 16 vs 4 threads
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
124
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.58/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$444.48
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$444.48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12134 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Mobile • Jun 1st, 2012
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3210M | vs | Intel Core i7-10700F |
---|---|---|
Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |