Buy on Amazon
CA$388
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms Core i5-2557M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 3256 days newer than Core i5-2557M.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2557M
- Consumes up to 74% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900F - 17 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 3% better in Crysis 3 Remastered than Core i5-2557M - 184 vs 178 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2557M - 20 vs 4 threads
Crysis 3 Remastered
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Core i9-10900F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
184
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.11/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$388
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i9-10900F Desktop Processor 10 Cores up to 5.2 GHz Without Processor Graphics LGA 1200 (Intel 400 Series chipset) 65W
Buy for CA$388 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 121 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Core i5-2557M
Mobile • Jun 1st, 2011
Core i9-10900F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-2557M | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 1st, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 10 |
| 4 | Threads | 20 |
| 1.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 2.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 17.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
