Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms the cheaper Core i5-2300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-2300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 2426 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-2300.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2300
- Up to 78% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - CA$44.35 vs CA$200.98
- Up to 77% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - CA$0.23 vs CA$1.0 per FPS
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 95 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Performs up to 5% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i5-2300 - 201 vs 191 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2300 - 16 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
191
95%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.23/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$44.35
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$44.35 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 170 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
201
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1/FPS
23%
Price, CA$
CA$200.98
22%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$200.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 171 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-2300 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 180 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |