Key Differences
In short — Core i5-14400 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10320 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10320 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-14400 is 1348 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-10320.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14400
- Performs up to 9% better in Saints Row than Core i3-10320 - 179 vs 164 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10320 - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Up to 21% cheaper than Core i5-14400 - CA$275.31 vs CA$349.89
- Up to 14% better value when playing Saints Row than Core i5-14400 - CA$1.68 vs CA$1.95 per FPS
Saints Row
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
179
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.95/FPS
86%
Price, CA$
CA$349.89
78%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$349.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 140 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
164
91%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.68/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$275.31
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$275.31 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 140 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-14400 | vs | Intel Core i3-10320 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |