Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10320 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10320 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900 and the cheaper Core i3-10320 have been released at the same time.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Up to 34% cheaper than Core i9-10900 - CA$258.88 vs CA$394.99
- Up to 34% better value when playing Monster Hunter: World than Core i9-10900 - CA$1.0 vs CA$1.51 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900
- Performs up to 1% better in Monster Hunter: World than Core i3-10320 - 261 vs 258 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10320 - 20 vs 8 threads
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
258
98%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$258.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$258.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 153 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
261
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.51/FPS
66%
Price, CA$
CA$394.99
65%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$394.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 153 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10320 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |