Buy on Amazon
CA$387
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $242
Availability
MSRP in USD: $242
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13500 outperforms the cheaper FX-8300 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13500 is 3725 days newer than the cheaper FX-8300.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13500
- Performs up to 32% better in Valorant than FX-8300 - 901 vs 684 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-8300 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8300 - 20 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8300
- Up to 78% cheaper than Core i5-13500 - CA$83.46 vs CA$387.0
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Intel® Core™ 13th Generation i5-13500 Desktop Processor (14 Core (6 P-Core + 8 E-Core), 24 MB Cache, up to 4.8 GHz, LGA1700, Intel® UHD Graphics 770)
Buy for CA$387 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 245 minutes ago
AMD FX-8300 FX 8300 FX8300 3.3 GHz Eight-Core 8M Processor Socket AM3+ CPU 95W Bulk Package FX-8300
Buy for CA$83.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 245 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i5-13500
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FX-8300
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-13500 | vs | AMD FX-8300 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
| Core i5 | Collection | FX |
| Raptor Lake | Codename | Vishera |
| Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 8 |
20 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
