Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1950X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 1973 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 5% better in Metro Exodus than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 150 vs 143 FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Up to 14% cheaper than Core i5-13400F - CA$1393.07 vs CA$1617.19
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-13400F - 32 vs 16 threads
Metro Exodus
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for CA$1,617.19 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74056 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
143
95.33333333333334%
Value, CA$/FPS
Price, CA$
CA$1393.07
100%
Buy for CA$1,393.07 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74058 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Single-Core
1171
51.1353711790393%
Multi-Core
7539
70.1628664495114%
Intel Core i5-13400F | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 16 |
16 | Threads | 32 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 180 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |