Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 7 2700 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 7 2700 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 1721 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 7 2700.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 15% better in No Man's Sky than Ryzen 7 2700 - 195 vs 169 FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 2700
- Up to 88% cheaper than Core i5-13400F - CA$280.0 vs CA$2360.47
- Up to 86% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Core i5-13400F - CA$1.66 vs CA$12.1 per FPS
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
195
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$12.1/FPS
13%
Price, CA$
CA$2360.47
11%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$2,360.47 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 173 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
169
86%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.66/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$280
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$280 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 174 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-13400F | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 2700 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 16 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |