Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-9700K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-9700K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 1538 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-9700K.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 14% better in New World than Core i7-9700K - 138 vs 121 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-9700K - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700K
- Up to 82% cheaper than Core i5-13400F - CA$427.88 vs CA$2360.48
- Up to 79% better value when playing New World than Core i5-13400F - CA$3.54 vs CA$17.1 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13400F doesn't have integrated graphics
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
138
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$17.1/FPS
20%
Price, CA$
CA$2360.48
18%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$2,360.48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 146 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
121
87%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.54/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$427.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$427.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 147 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-13400F | vs | Intel Core i7-9700K |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 95 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |