Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600KF outperforms the cheaper Core i7-875K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-875K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600KF is 3943 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-875K.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600KF
- Performs up to 18% better in Escape From Tarkov than Core i7-875K - 223 vs 189 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-875K - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-875K
- Up to 56% cheaper than Core i5-11600KF - CA$112.0 vs CA$255.0
- Up to 48% better value when playing Escape From Tarkov than Core i5-11600KF - CA$0.59 vs CA$1.14 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600KF - 95 vs 125 Watts
Escape From Tarkov
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
223
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.14/FPS
51%
Price, CA$
CA$255
43%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$255 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16 minutes ago
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
FPS
189
84%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.59/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$112
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$112 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11600KF | vs | Intel Core i7-875K |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | May 30th, 2010 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Lynnfield |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 22.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |