Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400H outperforms Core i9-10900KF on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11400H is 376 days newer than Core i9-10900KF.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400H
- Performs up to 1% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i9-10900KF - 196 vs 195 FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900KF - 45 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900KF
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11400H - 20 vs 12 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
195
99%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.12/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$412.49
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$412.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5249 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Mobile • May 11th, 2021
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11400H | vs | Intel Core i9-10900KF |
---|---|---|
May 11th, 2021 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Tiger Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel BGA 1787 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 10 |
12 | Threads | 20 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
UHD Graphics | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |