Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1840 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1840 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11400F is 2511 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1840.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400F
- Performs up to 9% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than Celeron G1840 - 127 vs 116 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1840 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1840
- Up to 79% cheaper than Core i5-11400F - CA$41.21 vs CA$196.23
- Up to 77% better value when playing ARK: Survival Evolved than Core i5-11400F - CA$0.36 vs CA$1.55 per FPS
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than Intel Core i5-11400F - 53 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11400F doesn't have integrated graphics
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
127
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.55/FPS
23%
Price, CA$
CA$196.23
21%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$196.23 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2562 minutes ago
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
116
91%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.36/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$41.21
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$41.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2562 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11400F | vs | Intel Celeron G1840 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 53 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
No | Overclockable | No |