Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-11400 outperforms the more expensive Core i9-10900KF on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-11400 is 320 days newer than the more expensive Core i9-10900KF.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400
- Performs up to 2% better in No Man's Sky than Core i9-10900KF - 187 vs 183 FPS
- Up to 48% cheaper than Core i9-10900KF - CA$214.99 vs CA$412.49
- Up to 49% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Core i9-10900KF - CA$1.15 vs CA$2.25 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900KF
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11400 - 20 vs 12 threads
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
187
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.15/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$214.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$214.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3590 minutes ago
Buy for CA$412.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3590 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11400 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900KF |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 10 |
12 | Threads | 20 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |