Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10600K outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-10600K is 994 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600K
- Performs up to 6% better in Battlefield V than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 248 vs 234 FPS
- Up to 86% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - CA$199.99 vs CA$1393.07
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 95 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10600K - 32 vs 12 threads
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for CA$199.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74341 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
234
94.35483870967742%
Value, CA$/FPS
Price, CA$
CA$1393.07
14%
Buy for CA$1,393.07 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74341 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Single-Core
1171
70.62726176115802%
Multi-Core
7539
100%
Intel Core i5-10600K | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Comet Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 16 |
12 | Threads | 32 |
4.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
41.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |