Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10500 outperforms the cheaper FX-4300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10500 is 2746 days newer than the cheaper FX-4300.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10500
- Performs up to 10% better in F1 22 than FX-4300 - 277 vs 252 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-4300 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4300 - 12 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-4300
- Up to 79% cheaper than Core i5-10500 - CA$36.09 vs CA$175.0
- Up to 78% better value when playing F1 22 than Core i5-10500 - CA$0.14 vs CA$0.63 per FPS
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
277
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.63/FPS
22%
Price, CA$
CA$175
20%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$175 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
252
90%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.14/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$36.09
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$36.09 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10500 | vs | AMD FX-4300 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Comet Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |