Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10500 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1620 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10500 is 2705 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10500
- Performs up to 19% better in Battlefield V than Celeron G1620 - 243 vs 205 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Up to 83% cheaper than Core i5-10500 - CA$32.99 vs CA$199.15
- Up to 80% better value when playing Battlefield V than Core i5-10500 - CA$0.16 vs CA$0.82 per FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i5-10500 - 55 vs 65 Watts
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
243
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.82/FPS
19.51219512195122%
Price, CA$
CA$199.15
16%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$199.15 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1847 minutes ago
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
205
84.36213991769547%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.16/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$32.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$32.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1841 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
409
26.925608953258724%
Multi-Core
723
13.217550274223036%
Intel Core i5-10500 | vs | Intel Celeron G1620 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Comet Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |