Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400F outperforms the cheaper FX-8320 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-10400F is 2746 days newer than the cheaper FX-8320.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Performs up to 9% better in Apex Legends than FX-8320 - 279 vs 256 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8320 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320 - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-8320
- Up to 15% cheaper than Core i5-10400F - CA$111.14 vs CA$129.99
Apex Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for CA$129.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77835 minutes ago
Buy for CA$111.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77834 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10400F | vs | AMD FX-8320 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Comet Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |