Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4670 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-4670 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10400 is 2524 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4670.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400
- Performs up to 6% better in Rust than Core i5-4670 - 196 vs 185 FPS
- Consumes up to 23% less energy than Intel Core i5-4670 - 65 vs 84 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4670 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4670
- Up to 30% cheaper than Core i5-10400 - CA$128.63 vs CA$184.99
- Up to 26% better value when playing Rust than Core i5-10400 - CA$0.7 vs CA$0.94 per FPS
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
196
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.94/FPS
74%
Price, CA$
CA$184.99
69%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$184.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
FPS
185
94%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.7/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$128.63
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$128.63 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10400 | vs | Intel Core i5-4670 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2013 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 84 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
No | Overclockable | No |