Buy on Amazon
CA$104.99
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $122
Availability
MSRP in USD: $122
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $417
Availability
MSRP in USD: $417
No items available
Key Differences
In short — Core i3-9100F outperforms Xeon E5-2620 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-9100F is 1688 days newer than Xeon E5-2620 v3.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Performs up to 7% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Xeon E5-2620 v3 - 131 vs 123 FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 - 65 vs 85 Watts
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100F - 12 vs 4 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Core i3-9100F
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
131
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.8/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$104.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i3-9100F Desktop Processor 4 Core Up to 4.2 GHz Without Processor Graphics LGA1151 300 Series 65W, BX80684I39100F
Buy for CA$104.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 217 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Core i3-9100F
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Xeon E5-2620 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-9100F | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Haswell-E |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
| 4 | Threads | 12 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 85 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
