Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-8100 outperforms the more expensive Core i7-3930K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-8100 is 2152 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-3930K.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8100
- Performs up to 3% better in Dead Space than Core i7-3930K - 150 vs 145 FPS
- Up to 79% cheaper than Core i7-3930K - CA$104.99 vs CA$499.0
- Up to 80% better value when playing Dead Space than Core i7-3930K - CA$0.7 vs CA$3.44 per FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Core i7-3930K - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-3930K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3930K
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-8100 - 12 vs 4 threads
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
FPS
150
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.7/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$104.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$104.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 165 minutes ago
Buy for CA$499 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 164 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Desktop • Nov 14th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-8100 | vs | Intel Core i7-3930K |
---|---|---|
Oct 5th, 2017 | Release Date | Nov 14th, 2011 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge E |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 130 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |