Key Differences
In short — Core i7-14700F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-8100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-8100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-14700F is 2286 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-8100.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8100
- Up to 70% cheaper than Core i7-14700F - CA$145.0 vs CA$481.99
- Up to 64% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Core i7-14700F - CA$1.12 vs CA$3.15 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-14700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-14700F
- Performs up to 19% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Core i3-8100 - 153 vs 129 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-8100 - 28 vs 4 threads
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
FPS
129
84%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.12/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$145
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$145 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 198 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
153
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.15/FPS
35%
Price, CA$
CA$481.99
30%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$481.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 196 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-8100 | vs | Intel Core i7-14700F |
---|---|---|
Oct 5th, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 20 |
4 | Threads | 28 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |