Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-10700F outperforms the more expensive Core i7-3930K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-10700F is 3090 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-3930K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 9% better in F1 22 than Core i7-3930K - 279 vs 256 FPS
- Up to 25% cheaper than Core i7-3930K - CA$373.06 vs CA$499.0
- Up to 31% better value when playing F1 22 than Core i7-3930K - CA$1.34 vs CA$1.95 per FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Core i7-3930K - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3930K - 16 vs 12 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for CA$499 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 150 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
279
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.34/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$373.06
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$373.06 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 151 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Nov 14th, 2011
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3930K | vs | Intel Core i7-10700F |
---|---|---|
Nov 14th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
Sandy Bridge E | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |